a somewhat concise explanation of why ....

... the most recent eB@y changes suck.

Yeah, I'm a boycotter. A forever boycotter. I have moved away from ever buying or selling at eB@y ever again.

Someone asked on a board I frequent for an explanation why people people are angry enough to boycott.

Of course I had to flap my trap!

[RANT]I think the crux of the matter even before the changes was that the prices we pay for listing fees on eB@y keep going up while the quality of customer service keeps going down.

Combine that with the fact that the changes they made this last time have nothing to do with improving the buying experience - that was a fine example of marketing jargon, ie: blowing sunshine up our ... skirts.

The changes have everything to do with driving away the small sellers; forced escrow, forced use of P@yPal for new sellers, imbalance in the feedback system, fee increase ...

Those things *might not* ever hurt the small sellers with high profit big ticket items because they *generally* have a dedicated set of customers.

It's also a matter of the 80/20 rule.
20% of eB@y's customers bring in 80% of eB@y's funding - that's the large Power Sellers
80% of eB@y's customers bring in 20% of eB@y's funding - that's you and me.

Large sellers are mainly automated, they don't need the hand-held service that a smaller seller may need.

For example; large sellers eat the loss in listing & final value fees when they get a deadbeat bidder.
This link is to a transcribed conference call between three large eB@y Power Se!!ers ... 39 pages if you want to read it - I did. Link here - it is a PDF file
Even they ain't happy. One of these large sellers estimates that his yearly fees will go up by $30,000. So he's going to have to lay off his most recent hire and push back expanding his business for a while.

Smaller sellers jump thru the hoops to get their money back after getting stung by a deadbeat buyer.

There's an estimated 6-10% of auctions/listings that end without payment ... figure that into the last fact ...

Now understand, that those 80% are those that give eBay the "flea market" look their new CEO finds so distasteful.

To add insult to injury, he also refers to the customers that protest any changes as "noise" - never mind that many of those protesting are living off of the small margin of profit they get on their eB@y sales.

Now with the new fee change those who have a higher sell-thru rate on their smaller ticket (under $50) items are going to see a substantial increase in fees.

I've yet to hear of someone who makes a living on eB@y who sells larger ticket items.
And those of us who sell the neat "It" items have a higher sell-thru rate.

Does this effect me as a seller? Not really, I can find other venues to sell and choose to do so.
I am upset for all the people that are living on the margin that use eB@y to keep afloat - these changes will hurt them most of all.

And for buying I also have a handy-dandy link index of sellers of all my favorite items (dolls and fabrics).
And today my darling hubby is working on making the sites on the doll index search-able too.

eB@y doesn't want me. And I don't need them.[/RANT]


Amazingly I didn't expound on why it stinks that sellers can no longer leave anything but posistive feedback for buyers ... it's kind of hard to get thru some people's heads that eB@y was started with auction house rules; if you don't pay for something you've bid on or generally act like a twit you get shut out from attending future auctions.

And then someone else asked a more specific question about feedback changes ... somehow my explanation there led into the issues about the forced escrow ...


Your total positive feedback stays - negative feedback for everyone disappears after a year.

But now the DSR/star ratings are coming more into play ...

Your star rating is good for 30 days.

Your star rating, Power Seller status (or lack thereof), and most importantly how much you've sold in the category you're listing in all figure into how far down in the results you are found when the new search engine "Best M@tch" kicks in.

The DSR rating also comes more into play in determining if the item you are selling is at risk for escrow - in fact it seems to be the deciding factor.

For instance you sell a repainted doll or high-end doll gown once or twice a month ... you haven't sold in over a month, or one of your few buyers in the last month has "dinged" your star rating (even out of ignorance or simple pure malice).
Your star rating is now either non-existent or low.
Meaning your high-ticket sale being paid for thru P@yPal is at risk of having the payment held for up to 21 days.

You still need to ship the item before receiving funds.

[RANT]What if you were depending on payment to afford shipping because of the item's bulk and/or value?

What if buyer decides to tell P@yPal that item was never rec'd?

I smell lawsuits in the making. [/RANT]


Of course Murphy's Law needs to rear it fugly head ... weeks ago I contacted a favorite eB@y fabric seller about some much coveted silk velvet she used to have. She said she'd let me know when more arrived.
More did.
Right in the middle of the boycott and she has no off-eB@y website that I know of.

Gah.

- - - - - - - - -

editing to add: HA!

I just found them online!!!

Happy fabric days for me!!! Whee-hee!!!

at time of last post I thought I had enough fabric ...

I was wrong.

I am a bad bad bad fabric whore.

And I still want more.

Vicious cycle this.

I'm keeping a short list now.
(And sticking to it!)

Not buying on evilB@yP@l anymore should help.
(The fact that I have an index site doesn't.)

Oh yeah, I think I'll finally start selling on Etsy.
(and opening a Google Checkout acct - fuck Eb@yP@l!)

And I need to e-mail my favorite sellers and see if they're bailing from eB@y too - enough is enough ya know? The lube tube ran out.

*sigh!* Change sucks, but is sometimes necessary.

on Pumpkin Butts and other projects ...

Am headed to a convention in less than a couple weeks and am a MASTERcrastinator, some are PROcrastinators, apparently I've hit master status.

My goal for this convention is make and sell enough doll clothes in the room sales to pay for the trip (and maybe then some - we still need a new couch for the kids' romper room, a nice one-piece futon couch from Big Lots will work just fine). The problem? I only started sewing three weeks before the convention. At any rate, I've been having fun coming up with patterns that fit a somewhat wide range of 60cm female ball jointed dolls.

So far I've made a dirndl, a couple of cowgirl outfits (one corseted, one not), a Bo-Peep dress, a corset for a Can-Can outfit, and Pumpkin Butts.

Pumpkin Butts? Yes, Pumpkin Butts. Short bubble skirts of iridescent orange fabric with a large "squash flower & vine" ribbon embroidery on it, sashed by an iridescent lime green and orange ribbon. Sounds ridiculous, but cute as all get out in my oh-so unbiased opinion. I am keeping the prototype, the knit inner-layer got a little twisted, so I won't sell it.

I still need to make another dirndl, finish two Can-Can outfits - might skip those and just make the crap-load of corsets, also lace wrap blouses in both black and white, sets of stretch lace blouses (a set equals one black, one white), some peasant skirts, some "Milagra" dresses, some "Francesca" dresses, and wiggy caps for table gifts for the finale Black & White Ball event.

So what am I doing here? Procrastinating.

on not letting commissions be a bane of existence ...

I don't take commissions anymore. It's for the best. There's not enough time in the day for me to take care of children, home, pets, commissioned jobs and still do what I'd like to do. A friend of mine is a total machine behind her sewing machine; she sews as we chat on the phone, keeps an organized home and active family, takes on commissions and sews projects of her own to sell. Wow! I'd give hubby's left nut for that energy! (Hell, he might even let me have it removed - just that one anyway - so more would get done around the house!)

When commissions were part of how my little doll-design business went it seemed that the same thing was being commissioned over and over and dreading that same project repeated stalled everything else that was in my mind to do. And goodness forbid you quote four weeks to complete an outfit and in that time make another just to sell in an online auction! "Where is my oufit? I paid already it should be in hand now!" Nevermind that I asked not to be paid until project was complete and two+ weeks are left in the allotted time. (Only had that happen once, not fun, and not someone another commission was accepted from.)

Maybe that fear of condemnation is what holds me back when I've taken on a commission ... combined with the boredom of doing the same thing over again ... or maybe not letting people tell me what to do is my only outlet for rebellion as a married, stay-at-home Mom. In which case, hubby may want to hold on to that left nut!

Venting about creative control ...

Have been looking at cottage rose decorated cotton fabrics lately. Mixed with stripes. And stripes of roses and swirled ribbons in lovely pale pinks and baby blues. Mmmmm ... pretty stuff. Love it, love it. Can make it look elegant yet casual ... for this unfussy country girl - that will always prefer pearls to diamonds and vintage to new - it's a style that I've always enjoyed. I remember as a little girl in the 1970's my Grandma Jean decorating her home in antique linens and old found items that she arranged with a grace that is rarely seen. I even used Grandma's lovely style in a doll room I set up, it needs some work, but you get the gist ...



But something irks me. This is a style that's been around for quite some time, it evokes almost a Victorian feel in it's prettiness, but has a worn and aged feel to it, you know the phrase that defines it. I won't make it searchable, so will type it as "$h@bby ch!c." From my online research it seems that a particular interior decorating magazine first used the term in the 1980's, but it was trademarked by someone else in 1989. I can find no reference to the two entities being attached at any time. But since it has been trademarked/copyrighted to one person and her company to use the phrase for something other than that company's products or books is now a violation of the trademark/copyright/whatever - seen people get their auctions yanked on "that big site" for having the two words of that phrase in it in order, even when it acurately describes the style of the item being sold.

Ya know, if other big name decorating mavens out there cornered a common concept, and protected it with a bevy of lawyers, they would be further vilified. Not lauded as an original. (I recognize I could be completely wrong, it could be that this designer was working for said magazine and was the first to coin the term in print. But I know that this decorating style is older than the 1980's - if not the catchy name for it. And I do believe that if the suggested connection was the case, a reference to her time with the magazine in question would have been cited.)

I will continue to cherish and utilize the frugality, soothing elegance and grace that my Grandmother showed me. I personally won't purchase items that carry a trademark that doesn't allow others to define their chosen style in a quickly understandable manner.

Improv sewing ...

Well, I bulloxed up a baby dress I was converting into a doll dress as a tutorial for the KTD blog - ugh. Have another I'm working on, but still, it's disappointing when there's an idea, and the reality flops.

At least I was able to salvage the layered ruffled skirt of the baby dress. It made a nice doll skirt with matching ribbon folded over for the waistband. Am putting together a coordinating blouse of pink lace. That's something I love working with, re-embroidered net lace. I try to buy it in widths of 3+ inches, as trim, not the allover lace material in yardage, but as trim with one edge finished and one edge straight.

I don't work with patterns for a lot of doll clothes. For laces blouses and full skirts especially I'll skip pattern use and have the doll right there for fittings as I go. Seems to work best. Now, lets see if I can modify one of the other baby dresses I have on hand for that tutorial ...

edited to add on 7/8/07:
Well, I did it! Added sleeves even. Went from this:

to this:


another view:


The trick is finding the smallest baby sundress you can; newborn or 3 months size. And spagetti straps don't work, dresses with sleeves *might*, but depends upon the sleeve style.

Not exactly "fabric whore" related, unless you count that I look for these little dresses based on their fabric. This one in particular I enjoy because it's a lawn-weight cotton with a variety of fun prints on it for a great peasant effect. I used embroidered cotton lawn for the sleeves ... I think I may take the cuffs up a touch and add a bit of lace to them ...

Things are coming together ...

Finally, links are being gathered, added, sorted, re-thought out. FabricWhore.com won't be a lame-ass site anymore! But poor neglected domain name it was ... yes, a really raunchy fun name (surprised it was available frankly), with a good idea for a site, but it sat neglected for almost a year while I pondered the implications of fabric whoredom. Do I really want to admit to pining for fabric and "selling out" for it? It that a black mark on the women's movement to fess up to sex for goodies? Oh fucking hell ... I'm married. I'd do it anyhow because I'm happily married. So I shall revel in fabric whoredom, dammit! Now, if the hub wasn't a good husband/father/provider it'd be a different story ...